This section only mentions the T flag, and not the P flag. That doesnt seem right, since the P flag is clearly in use now and not "0". Was there a concern about a possible normative reference? I don't think there needs to be. Suggestion:
Old:+-+-+-+-+ flgs is a set of 4 flags: |0|0|0|T| +-+-+-+-+
New:
+-+-+-+-+ flgs is a set of 4 flags: |0|0|P|T| +-+-+-+-+
Actually, the bits are currently 0RPT :) -- RFC 3956 (which Updates 3306).
-- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
