> It would be really nice and handy to initiate either stateless or > stateful DHCPv6 with the same message. If so, we wouldn't need > the M/O bits anymore. In this case the client would simply initiate > a(n Information) Request message and would get all the information > that are available on the link, including an address or not.
So you don't believe that the RA in ND should be the authority to use a stateful model on an IPv6 link? /jim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
