On Thu, 2005-06-23 at 16:09 +0200, Stig Venaas wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 10:03:36AM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote: > > Tim > > > > Wouldn't an update to a policy table be enough to resolve the problem? > > Yes, but isn't it best that the default policy does the right thing? >
I agree. Is this something that may be mentioned in ULA spec? > Else everyone with ULA doing global multicast will need to update their > policies. Of course vendors could use their own default policy that is > different from 3484's policy... Yes. I've always considered policy from 3484 an example that will be modified by the end-user. That's why it's there. It gives a really basic default. If you want to be multiaddresses with ULA and global prefixes, you need to tweak things. -vlad -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
