> I used [DHCPv6lite] as a citation for compatibility with the > previous revs of the text, and the text RFC 3736 explicitly where I > wanted to emphasize that there is a specific way to use DHCP > described in that RFC.
Not sure I follow this. Does that mean that in the references section you expect RFC 3736 appear twice? I'm sure the RFC editor will ask the same question.... I.e., what do you want to see in the final RFC? (Assuming we actually ever agree and ship the darn thing!!! :-) Thomas -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
