On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Eliot Lear wrote: > Roger, > > On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Soohong Daniel Park wrote: > > > >> While adopting ULA into the local networks, I am curious > >> how to set universal/local bit of Interface ID. There is > >> no any mention in RFC4193. Which is correct ? 1 or 0 ? > > 1 is for those assigned to you while 0 are free for any to use last I read > > up on the subject. > > > > By my reading I think you have it backwards. Here is the relevant text: > > L Set to 1 if the prefix is locally assigned. > Set to 0 may be defined in the future. See > Section 3.2 for additional information.
sorry my mistake. > Today, so far as I know, there is no defined allocation plan or system > for one to set that bit to 0. Some months ago I asked about ULA and there was some discussion, one of them should include a link to a discussion about some ideas of a plan. Maybe they've moved on? Haven't seen anything more about it. (the list was either [EMAIL PROTECTED] or this list, don't remember and my mailarchive is a bit offline right now :( ) -- ------------------------------ Roger Jorgensen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | - IPv6 is The Key! ------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
