Bob, >> While adopting ULA into the local networks, I am curious >> how to set universal/local bit of Interface ID. There is >> no any mention in RFC4193. Which is correct ? 1 or 0 ? > > First to clarify your question, I think you are asking about the > universal/local bit discussed in the forth paragraph of Section > 2.5.1. "Interface Identifiers" of RFC4291. Not the "L" bit in RFC4193.
Yes. Definitely L=1 > The ULA document defines how to creates a local prefix for the site. > A node would create it's interface IDs in the normal matter as > specified in RFC4291. Nothing special is required or even desired. > The L bit setting is independent of the prefix (global unicast, link- > local, ULA, etc.). So, universal/local bit = 1. Because ULA provides its globally uniqueness. Correct ? Thanks, Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park) Mobile Convergence Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
