[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In some cases, customers may wish to have an alternative to the
existing mechanism (WHY they wish to have it is a separate
question, THAT they do is an issue which helped inform the
writing of our draft).
I am not opposed to doing something different, but there needs to
be something more than a wish to back it up.
Thanks Tony. Please keep in mind the ICMPv6 PD mechanism we propose
and the current DHCPv6 PD are not mutually exclusive (I realize
you're not saying they are).
A real reason why the ICMPv6 PD mechanism is proposed is THAT
customers have asked for it.
Customers of what? Customers at home for ISP and DSL? Customers of
netlmm deployments? Customers of mobile routers?
You could mention a little more of the customer landscape you see, in
current IETF effort terms, and still stay technical.
Alex
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
