Just to be clear (and I know you're aware of this, Tony), "lack of code" is a provably invalid argument in support of developing an alternative to DHCPv6 PD. It is simply not true to say that DHCPv6 PD is not implemented and has not been deployed. There are multiple server implementations available today, that run directly in network elements or as a standalone server, and client implementations available today. These implementations are sufficiently robust that they are in use today in commercial deployments.
- Ralph On 8/25/06 7:25 PM, "Tony Hain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] Lack of > code that implements PD is not a justification, because no code exists for > this approach either. Arguing existing RS/RA/ICMP code fails as well because > the pieces needed to make this work don't exist in any current > implementations. > > [...] > > Tony -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
