Good morning all, John makes an excellent point. I'd be happy to assist anyone writing the draft.
Best Regards, Tim Rom 8:28 >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: 2006/09/16 Sat PM 11:31:41 CDT >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: ipv6@ietf.org >Subject: RE: Endianness of IPv6 and payloads >Gentlemen, > >>> It would seem a fairly simple yet worthwhile thing to standardize the > >>> endianness of IPv6 (both headers and payload for that matter). >>> Is it the majority view that we should do this? >> >>I'm in favor. It's certainly a better use of the IETF's >>collective time than all the process discussions. > >So why doesn't someone write-up a draft, get a couple of people to >review it >and given this email thread, there should be enough energy to push it >as an informational / individual submission. > >John -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------