Le mercredi 10 janvier 2007 17:14, Pars Mutaf a écrit :
> > So, the proposal is that if the hash collides for different names,
> > then "johnsmith.local" must rename himself, right?
>
> Right. Please let me know if you see a problem with this.

My understanding of James remarks is that your proposal merely moves the 
problem away from DNS to Neighbor Discovery, but does not solve the 
core issue at all, which is that some kind of multicast/broadcast is 
needed for non-point-to-point IPv6 links.

-- 
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net/

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to