On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 03:54:48PM -0700, Dow Street wrote: > I think the new draft is too extreme in its mitigation approach, and > would favor the "disable by default" option instead.
I think the new draft is too soft in it's mitigation approach, and would favour language that more strongly encourages filtering rthdr0 on the forwarding path for all routers. > In this case, disabling by default and filtering when RH0 is turned > on allows for careful investigation and experimentation of different > use models. We've had decades to carefully investigate and expermient with different use models for loose source routing, and the only compelling ones we've discovered are malicious attacks. -Ryan -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
