Brian Haberman wrote: > While it would be useful to update 3542, I don't think it is necessary. > It is out-of-date given that it says the Type 0 routing header is the > only one defined (it isn't). However, I don't see the benefit of > revising that spec *just* for this. > > Perhaps we should simply add a statement to the errata page for 3542 > pointing to the deprecation document.
That's fine. Just trying to cover all the cases. Thanks -vlad -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
