At 11:44 18/05/2007, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
With regard to IPv4, ADs seemed to feel that it should be addressed
in a separate document.
Why? Are we going to have separate documents for IPv4 and IPv6 until
the end of time, even if the issues overlap 80%?
Having separate documents is a really good idea.... unlesss you are
willing to fight people that feel that introducing changes to v4
protocols damages their status quo.
As a matter of fact, I have often been surprised of v6 docs
referencing v4 docs as normative (eg., RFC 4443 referencing RFC1122).
IMO, that's a (politically) very bad idea.
Kindest regards,
--
Fernando Gont
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
