> -----Original Message----- > From: Roger Jorgensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Why are we even talking about ULA-C now? What you want is > nicely covered > by ULA... not ULA-C but regular plain stright forward ULA. Largely, but not completely. Think in terms of large platforms that have several different networks, administered by different entities, but easily isolated from The Internet or even a larger intranet. ULA-Cs are convenient to route within the platform, with the knowledge that they can easily be filtered at edge routers because they are easy to spot. Just like before, with site-local addresses, I'm sure this can be worked around, no matter what the decision is. Having to go to a RIR and ask for PIs is a possibility, although what's nice about ULA-Cs is exactly that you don't have to go to ask anything of anyone! I suppose it all depends on one's perspective. Bert -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
