> -----Original Message----- > From: Ole Troan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 4:16 PM > To: Dave Thaler > Cc: Hemant Singh (shemant); JINMEI Tatuya / ????; James Carlson; > [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ipv6@ietf.org > Subject: Re: Neighbor Discovery and PPP links > > Dave, > > > Then you will fail in cases like the one I noted above, and you won't be > > RFC compliant. RFC2461 requires NUD on _all_ links. (I don't think > > anyone is arguing it doesn't.) > > as long as we also agree that it is perfectly valid to operate p2p links > with NUD turned off.
Yes (but only for router-to-router connections which I believe is what you're referring to). RFC 2461 states: > Neighbor Unreachability Detection is used for all paths between hosts > and neighboring nodes, including host-to-host, host-to-router, and > router-to-host communication. Neighbor Unreachability Detection may > also be used between routers, but is not required if an equivalent > mechanism is available, for example, as part of the routing > protocols. -Dave -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
