On 2007-07-26 21:55, Roger Jorgensen wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Tim Enos wrote:
...
"The sole purpose of this group is in the maintenance of the core
IPv6 protocol specifications and *not* in the development of new
solutions or changes to the specifications.."
&& at least one of the group chairs doesn't consider it to be a core
protocol,
It probably isnt a core protocol, it is a set of IP addresses out of the
IPv6 address scope. I guess the right question is:
- who should in the future decide on usage of other sub-set of the IPv6
address scope?
6man, and tweak the charter to cover address architecture maintenance,
IMHO.
...
I'd say it should be removed from the charter.
why... it is a open discussion with two suggested draft as said above
and it is moving in the direction of some sort of consensus.
Exactly.
Brian
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
