At Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:36:06 -0800,
JINMEI Tatuya wrote:

> > I have a question about RFC 4862 Section 5.4.5.
> > Please let me confirm about it.
> > 
> > It says,
> > 
> >     909    If the address is a link-local address formed from an interface
> >     910    identifier based on the hardware address, which is supposed to be
> >     911    uniquely assigned (e.g., EUI-64 for an Ethernet interface), IP
> >     912    operation on the interface SHOULD be disabled.
> > 
> > Does the word 'hardware address' here mean MAC address itself?
> > Or the address which is assigned physically at the factory?
> 
> I'd say it's the latter, according to the background idea of this rule

Sorry, I made a very confusing typo: I meant "it's the former".

---
JINMEI, Tatuya
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to