Hi, Jinmei-san. Thank you very much.
Now I'm really clear. Regards, On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:26:38 -0800 JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:36:06 -0800, > JINMEI Tatuya wrote: > > > > I have a question about RFC 4862 Section 5.4.5. > > > Please let me confirm about it. > > > > > > It says, > > > > > > 909 If the address is a link-local address formed from an interface > > > 910 identifier based on the hardware address, which is supposed to > > > be > > > 911 uniquely assigned (e.g., EUI-64 for an Ethernet interface), IP > > > 912 operation on the interface SHOULD be disabled. > > > > > > Does the word 'hardware address' here mean MAC address itself? > > > Or the address which is assigned physically at the factory? > > > > I'd say it's the latter, according to the background idea of this rule > > Sorry, I made a very confusing typo: I meant "it's the former". ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Yukiyo Akisada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
