> From: Dino Farinacci <d...@cisco.com> > Because we want to make all combinations work.
I wasn't saying to drop support for 'IPvN in IPv6' encapsulations from the protocol, or the implementations. I was just saying take it out of the _RFC_. > Why move it to another draft when the same contention will occur. Don't advance the I-D - just leave it as an I-D. (Think of it as 'routing around the damage' :-). Noel -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------