> From: Dino Farinacci <[email protected]>
> Because we want to make all combinations work.
I wasn't saying to drop support for 'IPvN in IPv6' encapsulations from the
protocol, or the implementations. I was just saying take it out of the _RFC_.
> Why move it to another draft when the same contention will occur.
Don't advance the I-D - just leave it as an I-D. (Think of it as 'routing
around the damage' :-).
Noel
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
