>>>>> "Margaret" == Margaret Wasserman <[email protected]> writes:
Margaret> Hi Noel,
Margaret> On Jul 30, 2009, at 7:33 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote:
>>
> Dino, why don't we just drop the 'inside IPv6' encapsulations from
>> the spec? I.e. keep only IPv4 in IPv4 and IPv6 in IPv4? The
>> IPv6 encapsulations could be documented in a short non-IETF
>> note that's posted on a personal web page somewhere. (I'm
>> assuming here that there are a few ISPs who'd actually want to
>> run inside IPv6, otherwise we could just drop them entirely.)
Margaret> To drop the encapsulation in IPv6, you'd need to get
Margaret> LISP WG consensus to do so.
for a variety of reasons , I'd like to stop this thread here. If you
believe there is additional discussion of removing IPV6 encapsulation
from the LISP spec that needs to happen on the LISP mailing list,
please discuss with the chairs first.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
[email protected]
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
