>-----Original Message----- >From: Carsten Bormann [mailto:c...@tzi.org] >Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 10:34 AM >To: Hemant Singh (shemant) >Cc: ipv6@ietf.org; 6lowpan; Pascal Thubert (pthubert); Jonathan Hui; Samita Chakrabarti; Erik Nordmark; Dave Thaler >Subject: Re: off-link model in the 6lowpan talk: draft-ietf-6lowpan-nd-07
>Hemant, >it is probably best if you copy 6low...@ietf.org for discussing this. Will do - thanks. >> Note that if the multi-link, multi-hop network has all client nodes >> as off-link to each other, then there is only one type of regular ND >> (RFC4861) RA that can signal off-link. This is an RA with no PIO >> (Prefix Information Option). >Our RAs typically have a PIO with L bit off and A bit on (actually >usually a 6IO with a couple bits of additional information, but since >-07 the classic PIO works too). That is my very point. ND as specified by RFC 4861 has no means to signal a prefix as off-link, so the L bit cleared is not signaling off-link. >> Therefore it would be interesting to see the IPv6 ND RA config on >> the lowpan edge routers. >> >> Anyone has working models of this work to demo to us during any >> future IETF? >I'm sure that can be arranged in Anaheim. Great. Thanks, Hemant -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
