> My second point is that assumptions like "the best path is through a > prefix we both use" are silly. Analysis of a common traceroute will > show that two random users tend to use two random ISPs. So a routing > policy tat starts from "assume both users are using the same prefix" > is a lost cause. Start from the assumption that you're looking for an > address pair that works, and as a second choice, works well for a > given ISP pair.
+1 The state of the art, there, is ICE. Any proposed standard has to at least match the robustness of ICE. -- Christian Huitema -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
