> > > > No. > > The "uniqueness" property is defined as "guaranteed to not collide with an > IEEE802 identifier." IPv4 addresses do not have that property. > > Besides, the WKP prefix (64:FF9B::/96) falls in the ::/8 range reserved for > the IETF, the only range in which the U/G requirements do not apply. >
Thanks for the clarification. If WKP(64:FF9B::/96) is the consensus, it better to state clearly that WKP should not apply U/G requirements in the draft, right? Especially, in the section 2 "When using a /96 prefix, the administrators MUST ensure that the bits 64 to 71 are set to zero." How about this: "When using a /96 prefix, except the WKP that start with the binary value 000, the administrators MUST ensure that the bits 64 to 71 are set to zero." It's more clear. BRs Gang
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
