> Lets not make P2P links a special case. Lets do the job properly. Lets > make node addresses 8 bits or less. I know of a LAN that's currently operating with more than 30k nodes on it. I won't embarrass folks by naming names. ;-) Tony -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
- RE: router vs. host discussion in 6man today for th... Miya Kohno
- Re: router vs. host discussion in 6man today for th... Christopher Morrow
- Re: router vs. host discussion in 6man today for th... Christopher Morrow
- RE: router vs. host discussion in 6man today for th... George, Wes E [NTK]
- Re: router vs. host discussion in 6man today for th... Mark Smith
- DHCPv6 support for /127s, for ISP subscriber PPP/PP... Mark Smith
- RE: DHCPv6 support for /127s, for ISP subscriber PP... Frank Bulk - iName.com
- Re: DHCPv6 support for /127s, for ISP subscriber PP... Mark Smith
- Re: DHCPv6 support for /127s, for ISP subscriber PP... Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: DHCPv6 support for /127s, for ISP subscriber PP... Mark Smith
- Re: router vs. host discussion in 6man today for th... Tony Li
- Re: router vs. host discussion in 6man today for th... Mark Smith
- Re: router vs. host discussion in 6man today for th... Tony Li
- Re: router vs. host discussion in 6man today for th... Randy Bush
- Re: router vs. host discussion in 6man today for th... Mark Smith
- Re: router vs. host discussion in 6man today for th... Randy Bush
- Re: router vs. host discussion in 6man today for th... Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: router vs. host discussion in 6man today for th... Egor Zimin
- Re: router vs. host discussion in 6man today for th... Philip Homburg
- Re: router vs. host discussion in 6man today for th... Egor Zimin
- Re: router vs. host discussion in 6man today for th... Philip Homburg