>>> So, I really don't see why LAN segments *need* /64s either then. >> as the subject, but not the $subject, has changed, could you please >> remove me from the cc:s. thanks. > Apologies for that. Can we generalise the subject into non-64 bit > IIDs, as it also covers the /127 case, and nearly all the reasons for > non-/64s on LANs are the same as in the draft?
no. pick one fight at a time. we are trying to maintain a very narrow and precise focus. randy -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
