>>>>> "Pascal" == Pascal Thubert <(pthubert)" <pthub...@cisco.com>> writes:
 
    >> On 2010-08-09 22:17, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) wrote: > Hi
    >> Michael:
    >> >
    >> > With
    >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-roll-rpl-07#section-7.2 I >
    >> tried to stay within the lines of RFC 3697 as you also defend in
    >> your > mail.
    >> >
    >> > I think the question we have now is not whether that proposal
    >> is > lawful but whether the new law being defined at 6MAN would
    >> prevent it > in the future.  > If the updated rules allow, then
    >> I'll be glad to work on an FL-based > alternate to the
    >> IPinIP/HbH.
    >> 
    >> So I understand that ROLL would definitely need the ability to
    >> define explicit semantics on the label. Would it also need the
    >> label to be mutable?
    >> 

    Pascal> [Pascal] The FL based proposal for RPL uses 12 mutable bits.

    Pascal> They are used as an in-band control plane that checks the
    Pascal> consistency of routing states along a path. Those states can
    Pascal> easily get out of sync due to the nature of the links, but
    Pascal> the maintenance can be costly. We want to accelerate the
    Pascal> repairs on those links that are actually used when an
    Pascal> inconsistency is detected that will impact the delivery.

I don't understand how the FL helps us on this!  Probably I missed
something important.  What you write below was my entire understanding
of our need for an in-band tag.

    Pascal> RPL also builds multiple topologies (virtual networks
    Pascal> identified by an instanceID) to address various constraints,
    Pascal> in terms that can be such as metrics but also
    Pascal> administrative. E.g. a power utility Command & Control
    Pascal> network at home will have a specific ID that's different
    Pascal> from the default general purpose one, so the power related
    Pascal> traffic ends up at the power utility GW along a specific
    Pascal> graph.

    Pascal> An opaque instanceID for the topology can be known by the
    Pascal> end points. The instanceID is not necessarily related to QoS
    Pascal> and does not map to a per hop behavior, but in our case, to
    Pascal> acts more like L3 .1Q tag. The Flow Label is the only field
    Pascal> available for an application to pass such information to the
    Pascal> network. Thus the non-mutable 8 bits in the proposal.

+1

-- 
]       He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life!           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] m...@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
   Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
                       then sign the petition. 
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to