I'm in favor for adopting this I-D as WG item.
As already stated @ IETF77 I think this document is a very usefull and
necessary piece of work in order to allow DSL like access networks (N:1 VLAN
case) using SLAAC.
I unfortunately can't follow Hemants fears regarding DHCPv6 and SLAAC feature
parity.
Just my 2 cent
Olaf
PS: Besides that I would prefer to decouple the discussion and acceptance of
this I-D from the discussion about needed extentions / modifications of I-D
draft-gundavelli-v6ops-l2.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
