Ole Troan wrote: >> Thus, do ask Cisco and Juniper and other vendors where this now >> 'works' if this intentional, or if they might finally comply to the >> IPv6 specifications one day, as then you might better watch out for >> this as it will break your network. For the vendors that have it, >> it might maybe be an idea to have a 'disable subnetanycast' command >> or similar so that one can explicitly mark a prefix that way. > > it is intentional. there is a command to enable support for > subnet-router anycast if use of that is desired.
What's the authoritative online documentation (and specific section of that document) for this behavior? Thanks! Kind regards, -- Fernando Gont e-mail: ferna...@gont.com.ar || fg...@acm.org PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
