Please explain how ll would solve the problem first. Maybe the bcp38+1918 thread on nanog on recent days would be instructive.
Jared Mauch On Aug 16, 2010, at 2:49 PM, Ole Troan <o...@cisco.com> wrote: > > On Aug 16, 2010, at 20:34 , Christopher Morrow wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Ole Troan <o...@cisco.com> wrote: >> >>> one could equally just make a convention to use link-locals with fe80::1 >>> and fe80::2 >>> and /128s on each side if one needed global addresses for sources to >>> traceroute etc. >> >> no, ping/monitoring/data-collection fails in this case. (or needs to >> be overhauled to collect/test/monitor in new/fun ways) > > > how & why? please, give a more specific example. > > cheers, > Ole > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
