On Sun, 12 Sep 2010, Mark Smith wrote:
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 07:29:10 +0200 (CEST)
Mikael Abrahamsson <swm...@swm.pp.se> wrote:
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010, Mark Smith wrote:
So my question was how would you solve it (architecturally)?
Layer 2 devices inspecting traffic isn't architecturally acceptable
because it's a layer violation,
+1 on what Steinar Haug wrote.
Serious disconnect between map and reality here, Mark.
If you think that, then I don't think you've read my emails
properly.
... or there is a serious disconnect between your reality and my reality.
By saying that L2 devices doing L3 inspection is a layer violation and
isn't acceptable, you've dismissed the way millions of people are
connected to the internet as... er, I don't know. Not acceptable and
wrong.
If I have misunderstood your posting, please enlighten me.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
