Le 30 oct. 2010 à 00:58, Suresh Krishnan a écrit : > Hi Remi, > > On 10-10-28 01:35 PM, Rémi Després wrote: >> What I don't follow at this point is what you wish to have: >> - statu quo >> - a completion, at last, of the FL specification (i.e. in my understanding >> without changing the 20-bits field we have for it) - doing something else, >> but then what, with which target time frame? > > Certainly not option 1.
> It is not clear to me what your option 2 means (What do you actually mean by > "a completion at last"). It refers to the fact that, as long as the spec of FL's is under a menace of being deprecated or changed, no one can reliably plan to use it, including for load balancing. I find it unfortunate. Getting out of this, at last, would IMHO be a step forward. I think I have nothing more than to say on this subject, and therefore should probably better quit this discussion, and just let others exchange their technical arguments. If the community prefers to endlessly defer a reasonable spec of FLs, I doubt I can avoid it, and there is nothing vital for me. Kind regards, RD -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
