On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 19:08:45 +1030
Mark Smith <i...@69706e6720323030352d30312d31340a.nosense.org> wrote:

> Hi Hemant,
> 
> On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 19:11:17 -0600
> "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shem...@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> > Mark,
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> > Mark Smith
> > Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 5:12 AM
> > To: Thomas Narten
> > Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: draft-ietf-6man-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt
> > 
> > 
> > >I think the Addressing Architecture RFC would need to be changed, as it
> > >stipulates 64 bit interface ids, which I think implies a maximum of 64
> > >bit prefix lengths, unless these /127s were only permitted within 0::/3
> > >- the impacted text is in 2.5.1 of RFC4291 -
> > 
> > >"For all unicast addresses, except those that start with the binary
> > > value 000, Interface IDs are required to be 64 bits long and to be
> > > constructed in Modified EUI-64 format."
> > 
> > Why should any text in RFC 4291 change?  The IID for /127 starts with
> > binary 000 and only the Modified EUI-64 format has got to deal with the
> > u/g bits.
> > 
> 
> I'm pretty sure the leading three 000s referred to are at the start
> of the unicast IPv6 address, not at the start of the IID portion.
> 
> My assumption has been that this 000s exception is what has
> allowed allowed unicast ::1 to be a /128. I think ::1/64 would comply
> with the Modified EUI-64 requirement, so the only reason for the
> exception that I can think of is to allow the prefix length of ::1
> to be /128 instead of /64.
> 
> (In the past I've had some uses for multiple loopback addresses within
> IPv4 127/8, so I actually wouldn't have minded ::/64 being a loopback
> network/subnet, with ::1 the first default IID value for loopback, but
> other loopback IIDs allowed. IIRC, ntpd also uses addresses within IPv4
> 127/4 to represent different local time sources on the local host)
  ^^^^^

oops .. 127/8 

> Regards,
> Mark.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to