I think that SLAAC should be deployed in the sites which use the prefixes
longer than 64.
Don't put a limit on the prefix length.
DHCPv6 can be deployed in the sites which use the prefixes longer than 64.Why
can't SLAAC?
It is not reasonable.
From: TJ
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 6:58 AM
To: Brian E Carpenter
Cc: Scott W Brim ; Thomas Narten ; ipv6 ; huabing yu
Subject: Re: draft-yhb-6man-slaac-improvement-00
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 17:32, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com>
wrote:
<snip>
I'd rather get IPv6 deployed in a uniform way first.
I'd take that sentence a step or two further:
"I'd rather get IPv6 deployed in a uniform way."
or even simpler:
"I'd rather get IPv6 deployed."
To be (perhaps overly) blunt: IMHO the changes proposed in this draft create
unneeded confusion, solve a problem that is either non-existent or is readily
solved in other ways and can create functional problems / detriments to actual
deployment.
Note: I am ready, willing and (often!) able to be proven wrong ... (and welcome
the conversation!)
/TJ
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
