On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 16:59, Manfredi, Albert E < albert.e.manfr...@boeing.com> wrote:
> I guess I'm missing what the solution is. > The solution is for providers to not give out just /64s :). > > As 3177-bis says, the IETF has no control over how service providers hand > out IPv6 address space. From what I've been reading in the past few years, > it looks like at least some providers are planning to give /64s to > customers. > Really? None of the ISPs I have spoken with, and certainly none of the ones I have worked with, are following a /64 per client plan. I have discussed /48s vs /56s vs /60s ... but never a /64. If you know of any /64ers, please name-and-shame them - or atleast push them to start thinking more clearly! /TJ
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
