On Apr 5, 2011, at 13:36 , Thomas Narten wrote:
> 
> Case in point about how we are being *extremely* loose in using the term 
> "pseudo random".

I share your concern.  Would replacing "pseudo-random" with "low discrepancy" 
address your concerns?


--
james woodyatt <j...@apple.com>
member of technical staff, core os networking



--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to