In your letter dated Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:56:47 -0400 you wrote: >On Jun 23, 2011, at 5:31 PM, Manfredi, Albert E wrote: >> It is service providers that are interested in protecting their networks, in > this discussion. If they also happen to protect their clients, that is just a > nice byproduct. > >That's fine for service providers, but service providers are not the only inte >rested parties here. Mark's solution does fine for that use case, but I woul >d not want it on my home network.
Ideally, clients use end-to-end crypto to keep themselves secure, but the network still has to be protected against denial of service attacks. -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
