John, This should not be a surprising or controversial change to the node-requirements document. The WG made the decision earlier that we'd leave out a reference to the Flow Label work because we didn't want to have node-requirements block waiting for it, but we would revisit if that work finished in time.
It has. We should just make this change. There was never any doubt that node requirements would point to the updated Flow Label RFC. If we say "do it later, when we rev the document again", we should be realistic in that that probably won't happen for at least another year and probably more like 2+ years. Thomas -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
