On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 19:28 +0800, Ole Troan wrote: > refer to Mark's mail on search lists.
Why? It has no bearing on your question. You asked for things which could not be merged. I gave you an example. It wasn't a recommendation. > huh? that's exactly how router discovery in IPv6 works. > put all default routers on your default routers list. read 4861 and 4191 for > more details. Perhaps you should. Most of the discussion of default routers in those RFCs is actually about discriminating between not-so-default-after-all routers. However, it was indeed a poor example under the circumstances. Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer (ka...@biplane.com.au) +61-2-64957160 (h) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer/ +61-428-957160 (mob) GPG fingerprint: DA41 51B1 1481 16E1 F7E2 B2E9 3007 14ED 5736 F687 Old fingerprint: B386 7819 B227 2961 8301 C5A9 2EBC 754B CD97 0156
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
