>> How do you propose this get handled? > > I think the right way to handle this is the way that the MIF working group > has proposed: treat each provisioning domain separately. Do not try to > merge information you have no basis for assuming is valid across provisioning > domains (which is all configuration information). You wouldn't typically send > an IP packet with a source address for interface 2 out of interface 2. Why > would you query a DNS server out of interface 2 when you learned about it > through interface 1?
for clarification, that was not my proposal. my suggestion was to merge all information within one "provisioning domain". unsure if we will end up with provisioning domain = link, as detection of multiple provisioning domains on a single link may not be trivial in all corner cases. cheers, Ole -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
