On Jan 3, 2012, at 3:24 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> >> So, I don't think we can just wish away packet-too-big < 1280. > > Sadly, that seems to be true unless we make a much more radical change, > because of translators.
Sometimes presenting broken networks and hosts a non-working solution is the proper signaling mechanism to inform them they need to take corrective action. This is done by placing infected hosts in a walled-garden in some cases, or perhaps here, if they can't handle anything lt 1280, they need to repair or patch their host/stack. At some point these legacy networks need to be taken off life-support. - Jared -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
