On 01/05/2012 07:10 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > Supporting small fragments has high hidden costs. Some of them are > addressed by the larger fragment ID in IPv6, but not all of them. There > is still no way to authenticate an incoming ICMPv6 PTB message, so you
RFC 5927 is your friend. Check for "progress" on the corresponding connections on which you've received the packet. For UDP, forget it. Actually, the idea of using state (as the PMTU information) with a state-less protocol (such as UDP) should (by itself) raise concerns. Thanks, -- Fernando Gont e-mail: ferna...@gont.com.ar || fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
