On 01/05/2012 11:06 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: >> Because some clients ignore atomic fragments, because fragments would be >> dropped in the path to the client, or what? >> >> Note: I'm interested on the topic, but this one has to do more with Mark >> Andrews' proposal than with mine. -- Mine is about how to improve the >> state of affairs of IPv6 fragmentation. Mark's is about increasing its use. > > I'm more about making DNS work reliably.
Yes, sorry. The point I tried to make was that none of my I-Ds on fragmentation argued in favour of an increased use of fragmentation. That said, at least to the extent that I have studied your proposal, I agree with it (support it). Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
