Hi, Rémi, On 01/05/2012 02:02 PM, Rémi Després wrote: > Hi Fernando, > > Full agreement on the substance of your draft, and support for an RFC based > on it. > > However, I believe it should rather be a BCP than a Standard-track RFC. > (I don't see any need to standardize anything beyond what already exists.)
How is this different from, e.g. standardizing that hosts should discard overlapping fragments on Std Track? Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fg...@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
