On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 03:49, Tim Chown <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, there are two questions here. > > One is whether the WG believes the update as described in > draft-ietf-6man-rfc3484-revise-05 is correct and complete. I have not seen > (yet) any significant technical concerns raised. The last of those were > discussed and (we believe) resolved in Quebec. Are there any more?
It appears that there is general agreement here, with possibly a few technical/content nits that probably need to be sorted in a final revision, raised by Dave and documented in message: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/current/msg14984.html > The other is whether the WG believes we should publish an update, or a > complete fresh version of RFC3484. This was discussed previously in the WG > and the update path preferred. If a fresh version is now deemed more > appropriate, I am fine to work on that with the other authors if required. My understanding is that there is also general agreement here; that this should be published as an update (after being re-organized a bit) now, and then followed up with a replace (bis) I-D. As I have previously stated; the changes in this update are needed and are time-sensitive, the sooner this update can become an RFC the better. > We just need a decision so we can progress this - it's been so close to > release for a long time. Many of the changes in the update have been > implemented in a number of platforms already. Agreed, let's get this done! =) Cheers, ~Chris PS - I don't want to step on any toes here, but I'd be happy to take a stab at a revision based on the current feedback if the authors would like, I could probably get it done by the end of next week, possibly sooner. > Tim > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > [email protected] > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- -- @ChrisGrundemann weblog.chrisgrundemann.com www.burningwiththebush.com www.theIPv6experts.net www.coisoc.org -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list [email protected] Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
