Given Bill's draft, we may not have to argue this, but: On Mar 6, 2012, at 01:15, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> The ABNF does not describe the produced (encoded) > URI. That is certainly *not* my understanding of RFC 3986. (It is true that a number of real-word implementations allow pct-encoded in more places than the ABNF does. But being liberal in what you accept is a rather usual way of non-compliance. Challenge: Find a real-world URI not matched by the 3986 ABNF!) Grüße, Carsten -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
