On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Carsten Bormann <c...@tzi.org> wrote: > On Mar 7, 2012, at 15:22, Bill Fenner wrote: > >>> RFC 3986 is not sacred. >> >> Of course it's not sacred. > > Not sacred, but is is also not open for gratuitous changes. > > I don't see a technical reason to do anything else than what you proposed > (i.e., not to stay within the confines of the standard). > Apparently this is why we all still use QWERTY keyboards :-)
> To make this all more concrete: The address: > > fe80::1%en1 > > becomes part of a URI like this: > > coap://[v6.fe80::1_en1]/... > And hopefully coap://[v6.fdfd::1]/... would work as well? > which is really easy to explain and document. > > Grüße, Carsten -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
