On Mar 7, 2012, at 16:29, Kerry Lynn wrote: > And hopefully coap://[v6.fdfd::1]/... would work as well?
Oh. That may be a reason to go with v1, not v6... I don't think the idea is to *replace* IPv6address with IPvFuture. So I was thinking that this version of IPvFuture would be specifically done for the zone_id case. So the v6 (or v1) serves as a kind of advance warning "there will be a zone_id later). Grüße, Carsten -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
