On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder < j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 11:10:40AM +0100, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > > > I see no value in introducing a new separator. > > > > The value is providing a long-term path to cut and paste. Otherwise, > > I assume we would indeed choose the %25 approach. > > OK, I change my statement to: > > I do not believe that the value of introducing a new separator > justifies its costs. > > Is there any value in trying to add "%%" to the URI BNF? This would seem to give us *almost* cut and paste (which we don't quite have now anyway, since we must add '[' and ']') while disambiguating whether "%251" means "%1" or "%251" to the browser UI ("%%1" -> "%251"). Lots of systems use ESC ESC to really mean ESC. -K- > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >
-------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------