Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 14/08/2012 18:16, Simon Perreault wrote:
> > Since privacy addresses are supposed to be configured alongside > regular > > SLAAC addresses, there should be no need for an explicit fallback. > Just > > enable both SLAAC and privacy simultaneously. If SLAAC fails, you > still > > have privacy. > > True, but you won't have connectivity on any network that uses MAC > address > registration as a form of weak access control. Not that IPv6 can solve > that > problem, but it should be noted. Unless that MAC address access control is done at Layer 2, which is not uncommon. Bert -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
