On 2012-12-12 09:44, Magnus Westerlund wrote: > Thanks for the Review, > > On 2012-12-12 02:02, Joel M. Halpern wrote: >> This (and the companion document draft-ietf-6man-udpzero) seem ready for >> publication to me. >> >> I do have a minor questions. It is sufficiently minor that if necessary >> it may be ignored so publication can proceed. >> >> I section 5, bullet 3 talks about "tunnel protocol will not >> significantly increase the rate of corruption of the inner packet", and >> then talks about needing to use additional integrity verification if >> there is a risk of such increased corruption. My question is, what kind >> of encapsulating protocol would or could, by its nature, create such a >> risk? It is not at all clear to me what a protocol designer should be >> watching for. > > The one think we have determined could cause increased corruption is > tunnels that fragment. That is discussed in the document in Section > 3.1.5 but not explicitly linked to this bullet.
To make it clear we are not planing to make any changes to UDPZERO-08 to address this comment. Objections? Cheers Magnus Westerlund ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVM ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Ericsson AB | Phone +46 10 7148287 Färögatan 6 | Mobile +46 73 0949079 SE-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden| mailto: magnus.westerl...@ericsson.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
